Respond to the question of Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico was acquired as a territory as a result of the Spanish-American War.
Since the United States gained possession of Puerto Rico after the defeat of the Spanish in the Spanish-American War, Puerto Ricans have had different movements for statehood or independence. Those movements have resulted in three plebiscites on the political status of the island.
Puerto Rico is a self-governing and incorporated commonwealth state of the United States. In 1917, Puerto Ricans were given U.S. citizenship but were not allowed to participate in government. In 1922, the Puerto Rican Nationalist Party was established to support independence and to that end, instigated uprisings in 1930 and 1950. In 1947, international anti-colonial pressure helped gain Puerto Ricans the right to elect their own governor. In 1950, Congress passed an act to make Puerto Rico a commonwealth, and in 1952, Puerto Rico adopted its own constitution. Puerto Rico then formally became the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico with the status of a free associate state.
During the 1960s, agitation for independence in Puerto Rico increased, and the first status plebiscite was held in 1967. Commonwealth status received 60.4% of the vote, statehood received 39%, and independence received 0.6%. During the 1970s and 1980s, support for statehood grew, and another plebiscite was held. On November 14, 1993, Puerto Ricans voted for the retention of commonwealth status as a free associate state with 48.6% of the vote; statehood received 46.3%, and independence received 4.4%. On December 14, 1994 and again on January 23, 1997, the Legislative Assembly of Puerto Rico petitioned Congress to sponsor a referendum on the future political status of Puerto Rico under the U.S. Constitution (1787). In February 1998, President Bill Clinton openly supported another plebiscite for Puerto Rico.
On March 4, 1998, the House of Representatives approved the United States-Puerto Rico Political Status Act, which sponsored a referendum on Puerto Rico's political status. The legislation was approved by a one-vote margin, and a requirement to make English the official language of Puerto Rico was defeated by Republicans. On September 17, 1998, the Senate passed a resolution that supported self-determination for Puerto Rico and confirmed congressional authority to decide Puerto Rico's status. Both President Clinton and Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich supported the referendum.
On December 13, 1998, Puerto Rico was able to hold a status vote under local election laws. However, the 1998 plebiscite was different from the votes of 1967 and 1993. The Popular Democratic Party, which traditionally supported commonwealth status, disagreed with the definition of commonwealth on the ballot and supported an alternative definition that was rejected by the House Committee on Resources. The Popular Democratic Party then called for its members to vote for "none of the above," which was added to the ballot; it received 50.3% of the vote, while statehood received 46.5%, independence received 2.5%, free association received 0.3%, and "territorial" commonwealth received 0.1% of the votes cast.
The results were more confusing than helpful, and it was agreed that future plebiscites were needed to ascertain the meaning of the 1998 vote. Puerto Rico will hold a status plebiscite every 10 years until independence or statehood wins a majority.
Today, Puerto Rico retains its commonwealth status, which gives the local government authority to maintain order under its own constitution. However, U.S. laws prevail, and Congress has the ultimate authority over Puerto Rico. That status defers foreign policy, defense, and financial matters to the U.S. government. Puerto Ricans have U.S. citizenship, use U.S. currency, and are free to travel in and out of the United States.
"Puerto Rico statehood plebiscites." American History. ABC-CLIO, 2010. Web. 19 Sept.
2010.
Check out the following sites and answer this question, Should Puerto Rico become a state? Yes or no? (no maybes) All: Refer to at least one document and After 9/29agree/disagree with your classmates and refer to one document or link to another site/video.
Check out:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,591683,00.html
http://www.essortment.com/all/puertoricansta_rdla.htm
http://www.prstatehood.com/home/index.asp
ALL POSTS MUST BE COMPLETED BY MONDAY, OCTOBER 3rd for full credit. 10 points.
60 comments:
I think that Puerto Rico’s people should have the power to decide whether or not they want to become the 51st state. As the Fox News article mentioned, the people have voted three times since 1967, always against statehood. If I was to vote, I would vote with the majority, to remain a territory of the United States. As noted in the Essortment article, Puerto Ricans have a good deal; they receive the protection of the United States during wartime, benefits from Medicare, and the benefits of U.S. citizenship without paying taxes. The projected rise in the cost of living was a negative reason to become a state. I also think that the disappearance of the unique blend of culture found in Puerto Rico with becoming a state would be a terrible loss.
Danielle Chaloux (class 4)
Puerto Rico has always been considered a part of the United States whether it is below or on the same level but they were always given a different statehood or independence. Yes they were self-reliant but the U.S didn’t seem to allow them to use any of their self-advocacies to start their own government and become their own nation. Not until 1922 when the nationalist party was established did the Puerto Rico show their true colors and that they can prove themselves as a nation. After much conflict and nearly every decision for the country of Puerto Rico to obtain so many American attributes such as the English language and democratic stance were made the nation became one with the U.S and continues to retain its commonwealth status today. However, U.S. laws prevail, and Congress has the ultimate authority over Puerto Rico.
As for becoming their own nation there is lack of evidence that that will ever happen because U.S has shown so much power and control over them that it would take a very confident ruler to overtake our demands. But I personally feel that it is right for Puerto Rico to become their own nation. They have very well proved that they are willing to fight and stick together in order to have a strong government and vote for a president or governor whatever you may call it.
I don't think Puerto Rico should become a state. First of all many believe that its cause we don't want it, many people there don't think they need to become a state, one guys says "It's worked for about 50 years already. We get the best of both worlds"http://www.essortment.com/puerto-rican-statehood-56408.html. And the they really do get the best of both cause they receive the benefits of a US citizen and without the taxes, which they really can't afford.They also do have social security and medicare, plus they get the protection of the United states during war. They don't need a say in our government and it won't help them it will only hurt them, cause of the tax increases.Also the fact that they like to have there own place on the earth like participating in the miss universe pageant and the Olympics and said in this website http://www.essortment.com/puerto-rican-statehood-56408.html. So Puerto Rico should not become a state, and its for their own good
The United States is famous for being a country of freedom, and giving us the ability to succeed in life. So why shouldn’t Puerto Rico have the same benefits as us? To back up my point, statehood supporters “..believe that Puerto Rico is in an unique position to join this union and partake of the benefits, and responsibilities, of being an integral part of the United States of America. There are economic, social, and political advantages to becoming the 51st state” (Esscortment.com). Becoming a state would help “Puerto Rico receive taxes from their citizens to help build the infrastructure of the state.” (esscortment.com).Becoming a state would also benefit Puerto Rico politically as well, by “removing Puerto Rico from under the territorial claws of their U.S constitution and would put Puerto Rico on the same political footing as the other 50 states”(Esscortment.com). Other benefits include Puerto Rico’s ability to trade with U.S.A alliances , and the opportunity to enjoy high per capita income along with low unemployment rates. Sadly, the unemployment rate in the United States has dramatically increased due to the effects of 2008 but never the less; we are still considered to be a very wealthy country. After reading all of what we can offer Puerto Rico, I can’t vote against Puerto Rico becoming a state. As we were talking in class, the United States has the job of taking care of other weaker nations to make them successful. This should be done for Puerto Rico.
no puerto ricco should not become a state because the people of peurto ricco have it better there. they are a territory so they get all the benefits of a state but they can decide on what they want as there own country. if they become a state then they get all the debt and duty of a state. as the essortment artical says they don't have to become a state since they are a territory they have all the benefits but if they become a state they will gain some unwanted thing like rises in prices of living and not being a country in the Olympics
I don't think that it was right that they didn't even get rights to participate in the government until 1947, when they could elect their own governor. It took 30 years from when they were given U.S. citizenship, for the Puerto Ricans to be able to be apart of the decisions being made. It was good that they adopted their own constitution because then you would think that they would be able to control themselves and be free. It really wasn't fair though that they had to go by the American's rules still just because they lost the war. Even though they had control, they were still owned by America so they had to speak English and congress had the authority to decide Puerto Rico's status. They should be able to determine what happens to them and not have others control them.
I think Puerto Rico should stay the way they are right now. With that being said, many people in Peurto Rico have different opinions of what should happen. An example that supports my opinion is "One man in San Juan said, "I believe we should stay the way we are. It's worked for about 50 years already. We get the best of both worlds. " The people of Puerto Rico should decide on there own what to do as a nation. But choosing to split off from America will have consequences. They will lose benefits such as protection during times of war, being a US citizen without paying taxes and losing health care. It is up to the America in the end whether to make Puerto Rico a free nation or not, and that doesn't seem likely to happen at all. Puerto Rico should stay same right now because like the quote I showed earlier, the country is in the best of two worlds.
I believe Puerto Rico should become a state. Support for statehood is not yet at a majority in the commonwealth but it has grown marginally over the years. Without being a part of the United States, its economy would falter. Right now, the economy is so dependent upon US tourism, and the only reason they have the amount of tourism they do is because Americans can travel there without a passport. It is thought of as a good getaway- far enough away that you have to cross an ocean to get to it, yet you don't need to get a passport six months in advance. The multiple last minute vacationers in the us would no longer be going to Puerto Rico. Also, Puerto Rico is already basically treated like a state- they pay taxes and vote for the federal government. Why not make it official? Puerto Ricans must like the US because they keep migrating to the continental US.
No I don’t think Puerto Rico should become a state, but I do think that they have the right to vote to become one if they really want. As the Fox News article stated, “Puerto Rico is a self-governing commonwealth, but is subject to U.S. jurisdiction and sovereignty,” (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,591683,00.html #ixzz1Z CB4mmZa) but with all of the perks of the United States plus no taxes. But United States Law prevails over their own constitution so they’re not technically free to do whatever they like, and Puerto Rico has to use American Currency. Even with all of the perks that come with not being the 51st state, why wouldn’t Puerto Rico want to have control over themselves and vote for independence. I can definitely see why they would vote for statehood over independence because they already have to abide somewhat by American Law, use American currency and are registered citizens, but why would they not want complete control over what they can and can’t do? I think for their sake voting for independence will better benefit Puerto Rico in the long run.
I think that the way the American Government and Puerto Rico have worked together to accomplish what they have should stay the same. There is no arguing from a group of people that are opposed to the structure that we have followed for such a long time. It states, “Puerto Rico will hold a status plebiscite every 10 years until independence or statehood wins a majority.” I agree fully with this because it is going along with the American way but also giving the Puerto Ricans their own chance to vote if they wish. But why would the society want to change something there so used to? It seems that the outcomes will be worse than better and this could end up just leading to more conflict. In the article by Essortment, it talks about money, “The average electric bill is around $12 a month and water and waste collection is around $5 to $7 dollars a month. When Puerto Rico becomes a state the prices will greatly rise.The electric bill will go to $80 and the water and waste will go to $16 to 20 dollars.” Money costs are already an issue in America so I don’t think that we are ever financially stable enough as a country to take in more people to worry about. I also believe that the people living in Puerto Rico would be opposed to all these money increases. Overall it seems that the best bet to keep conflict down is to just keep doing what we have been.
Personally, I think the real question is, how is Puerto Rico becoming an official state of the U.S. actaully affecting U.S. citizens/puertoricians? Having a respectful relationship with the country, alone, may be a good enough reason for Puerto Rico to stay 'singled out.' But, as it states in prstatehood.com, "...inequality that Puerto Ricans have been forced to endure for 112 years." In America, two of many of our main constitutions are give respect and equality. Though the United States and Puerto Rico have equal citizenship, do the people of Puerto Rico actually feel that equality? It also says in prstatehood.com Ms. Soraya Rodriguez Capo and 'followers' are starting/started a campaign for proeduacation towards Puertorician school systems. They stated that their reasoning for wanting more than a U.S. citizenship is wanting a better education for their country and youth. I strongly believe that if not only the U.S. but every country is educated the world will be a much more reliable environment to live in. If Puertoricians actually believe that we, as a country, could give them more opportunities in life, then yes I think we should add a 51st state. The only exception with that reasoning is that if the U.S. gives them education, they should also give something back.
Yes, I think that Puerto Rico should become a state. The United States and Congress already has so much control over Puerto Rico, that it would be hard for them to transition into becoming a completely independent nation. Also, Puerto Ricans will be able to trade with any nations that are in alliance with the U.S, which is a very strong reason as to why to become a state. As said in the article, "Puerto Rican Statehood," "With becoming a state, Puerto Rico will enjoy the benefits of America's high per capita income and low unemployment rates. There are plenty of reasons as to why Puerto Rico should become a state, but one last advantage is that they would be politically equal with the other 50 states, and be able to have electoral votes and Presidential elections.
Honestly, I think what is going on is confusing and almost wrong. The United States gave the citizens of Puerto Rico citizenship in 1917, but they didn’t give them all of their rights. The Puerto Ricans do not follow the United States Constitution, since they have their own. The United States is holding onto Puerto Rico, but they won’t officially let it be a part of the country. On the other hand, what other alternative can Puerto Rico have? If they voted 50.3% for “none of the above” then what does the country want? They don’t want to become a state, independent, free association, or “territorial” commonwealth. So now the United States goes to say that Puerto Rico will have to wait 10 years until they chose independence or statehood and until that day they will remain how they are. In a Fox News article, Glenn Beck writes, “Some people like it, others don’t; they get to enjoy many of the benefits of America—like protection—and they don’t have to pay any taxes. That’s a pretty sweet deal” (“Puerto Rican Statehood Ahead?”). It seems like it’s a system that’s working relatively well for the people in Puerto Rico. I do agree with Eric when he said that the citizens have the best of both worlds. They don't have to pay taxes and, at least in present day, they reap the benefits of most US citizens. Unfortunately, I think that there will come to a point where people will want to have the land they’re living in actually be something. Whether it’s a part of the United States or their own independent country, no one can be sure.
No I do not think that Puerto Rico should become a state for several reasons. Puerto Rico is already self governing and as far as I can see things are going relatively well. They aren't involved in wars and they almost never come up in day to day news. I think that they need to make this decision soon so that the country can continue to grow and prosper. If they become a state their economy could change greatly and the government would change immensely. This could be to much for Puerto Rico citizens to handle if it affects their economy. I think that if Puerto Rico became a state it also wouldn't be good for the US because then we would have to change everything to 51 states but also were already in debt. The United States is in trillions of debt it wouldn't not be beneficial for Puerto Rico to get dragged into that and it wouldn't be god for us if we inherited any of their debts. Overall Puerto Rico becoming a state is not a good option for anyone especially the people. According to the Fox News Article and the background history given the citizens have voted against statehood every time. This is not encouraging and leads me to believe that they wouldn't be happy with the decision.
For the last 50 years, Puerto Rico has been a commonwealth of the United States. As stated in the Essortment article, Puerto Rico has been under the protection of the United States and has had to pay no taxes to our Government to get it. Aside from that they also get the benefits of Medicare.In my opinion this is a great deal because it is an improved version of our previous relations with England. Back when we were colonies, we were in essence a commonwealth of Britain. But Britain went wrong trying to extort us and treating us like second class citizens. Now however, Puerto Rico is allowed to govern itself and the people are happy that way. In fact 69.4% of the people voted to stay a common wealth. If we were to change that and make them a state then the cost of living would go up drastically for all parties involved.So all in all, i think Puerto Rico is better off as a common wealth both because it is more advantageous and because it is simply what they want.
Puerto Rico, a territory of the U.S, should remain in such fashion, rather than become the 51st state of the United States. Though there are many benefits and new oppurtunities that arrise when becoming a state, there are many more reasons as to why Puerto Rico should remain the same. The Ensortment article backs up my statement, listing many cons of statehood. One major factor is, "The cost of living will greatly rise" (http://www.essortment.com/puerto-rican-statehood-56408.html). Though it seems like a wonderful dream to be independent and recieve as many rights as U.S citizens, Puertoricans have to realize that the cost of living here (as a U.S's state) is highly expensive, and comes with many costs. For many Puertoricans, it may be impossible to pay much more drastically (the rent for a house in the U.S. is about double the rent in Puerto Rico). By Puerto Rico remaining as a territory of the U.S, costs will stay in managable numbers, the English language will not be forced down upon them, and a major benefit is they will always be protected during war by the most powerful military force in the world without having to pay taxes. It is smart and safe to say that Puerto Rico should not be the 51st state of the United States. With so many benefits at hand, why would Puerto Rico want it any other way?
I think that Puerto Rico should become a US state. They are already completely used to being under US rule. There wouldn't really be a huge transition to make, seeing as they've been under US rule for more than 110 years. The people are used to doing what the US says. Puerto Rico already gets lots of benifits from the US, but becoming a state would give them even more benefits. They would be able ot vote on US elections. (Presidential, etc.) The economy might even be helped since the US has such a low unemployment rate. It would help Puerto Rico tremendously and the change would not be big or hard at all.
I feel that Puerto Rico should have the freedom of speech to decide whether or not they feel they want to become a state. If the majority votes for statehood than that should be so, however there people should be allowed to choose the fate of there lives. A major downfall to Puerto Rico being a state include that they would most likely lose the small tradtional values and techniques of living that they have carried on throughout the years it flourished with Spain. They would be forced to conform to the norms of the other 50 states. One upgrade to becoming a state is they would be strongly connected in a secure bond of political, military and economic power that has for many years stood strong.
I think that Puerto Rico should become the 51st state. Like Xavier said, it has been under the power of the U.S. for 110 years. I think that if they were to pay taxes, and use American companies for electricity, water, etc. then it could help our economy. Although the prices would rise for them, statehood would give them the opportunity to trade with all nations that are with alliance with America(http://www.essortment.com/all/puertoricansta_rdla.htm)
It would not be hard for Puerto Rico to make the transition into statehood because the U.S. already has alot of power in it. So i believe that it should become a state.
Class 5
Puerto Rico should be allowed to make their own decision on whether they would like to become a state or not. Although they are considered a part of the United States, they are still not part of the “50 States”. They already have their own government and they are doing just fine without the government help of the United States. After 1922, Puerto Rico demonstrated that they are able to take care of their own land and territory. There already has been many contradicting statements on whether Puerto Rico should be the 51st state of the United States but there was also conflicts decades ago and if the people solved it then, then I believe we should let Puerto Rico stay as a territory of the United States. Also, the United States has not tried to control Puerto Rico as much anyway so it would be very difficult and it could lead to negativity between their territory and ours. I believe Puerto Rico should stay as their own territory and the United States should remain as 50 states.
Class 4
It is not easy to say whether or not I believe Puerto Rico should become a state or not. There are many reasons that could argue for both sides of the argument. Although after reading the document, I feel as though Puerto Rico should stay where they are and not become a state. From 1917 to 1952, it had already become more established in that short amount of time. In 1917, Puerto Ricans were given US citizenships, but were not allowed to participate in government. Then, by 1952, Puerto Rico had their own constitution. A fox news article was written and states that, “It’s [Puerto Rico] been a U.S. territory since after the Spanish-American War of 1898. They're not an independent country. It's similar to Guam, the Virgin Islands and American Samoa. Some people like it, others don't; they get to enjoy many of the benefits of America — like protection — and they don't have to pay any taxes” (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,591683,00.html). I believe that Puerto Rico should remain where they are now.
I believe that Puerto Rico should not be a US State. It is simply because they do not want to be the 51st US state. They have voted on it three times and each time they have voted against. The CNN report said that they have a good life, with no taxes, US citizenship, and protection. With all of that they don't need to be a US state. I agree with Danielle Chaloux when she says to just leave them as US territory. It has been working out fine and will for a while.
I’m going to take a stance against Puerto Rico becoming the 51st state of America looking from the Puerto Rico side. They are a self-governing commonwealth and have been a U.S. territory for over a 100 years (113 years to be exact) and have done just fine. They get the protection of the United States without having to pay any taxes. Maybe somebody might think that isn’t fair but if we look at the costs to live there and how much it will increase if U.S. taxes were put into place, Puerto Rico not be as much of a success. The electric bill will go from $12 to $80 and the water and waste will go from $5-$7 to $16-$20. They have an interest rate of 5 to 6% while the U.S. is up to 8.5 to 12%. The Puerto Rican citizens have voted against becoming a state and I think that as Americans we should value their voice. An economic pro of keeping Puerto Rico an independent is that it will still be able to have trading agreements with other free nation on its own will. I think 50 states is a good number to have! Who would want to change ever single American flag to 51 stars anyway?
Stephanie Roman
I feel Puerto Rico should stay how it is. It should not become a state because it wouldn't benefit them a lot. As of right now the cost of housing, water, and electricity are a lot lower than ours. If they became a state, the prices would sky rocket. Why would they want to vote to spend more money then they have to? I agree with Sarah. They have the best of both worlds, why would they want to change it? As said in the essortment.com (http://www.essortment.com/puerto-rican-statehood-56408.html), they have their own representatives in the Miss Universe Pageant, they represent themselves in the Olympics, so they do have some of their own freedom.
Also, Puerto Rico has a lot of the same rights other states have. No, they don't have all but they have most of them. A website I found explains how Puerto Rico's government is basically set up just like any state is. (http://www.helium.com/items/394482-should-puerto-rico-remain-a-us-territory-or-become-the-51st-state). "First, their government is set up like a state in the United States. They have 51 seats in the house of reps and 27 seats in the Senate. Their leader is an elected "Governor." Second, our federal court system is integrated in to the Puerto Rican legal system. Third, our military has an active and albeit horrid presence on the Vieques island (whether we should stop the bombing there should be another topic of debate). Fourth, the United States has control over the same areas as it does when it comes to the current states in the US. Under the 10th amendment, there is a balance of federalism. The US controls social security, immigration, and even the postal service in Puerto Rico.". Why become an official state when you don't have to pay taxes, electricity and every day needs are cheaper, and they are basically treated as a state anyway minus just a couple rights. Why not just keep the best of both worlds?
No, I do not think that Puerto Rico should become a state. As others have mentioned, the current status of Puerto Rico as a commonwealth state seems to put them in a good place. As mentioned in the foxnews.com article, Puerto Ricans currently "get to enjoy many of the benefits of America — like protection — and they don't have to pay any taxes." If Puerto Rico were to be admitted as the 51st state in America, their living costs would increase exponentially. New taxes would be introduced including income taxes as well as general sales tax. Also, interest rates would increase along with many other general costs. The Puerto Rican economy is already struggling, so by introducing so many new expenses citizens would only become more and more financially burdened (essortment.com & queenscourier.com- Pros and Cons of Statehood for Puerto Rico_. Another major point which leads me to oppose the statehood of Puerto Rico is the fact that, if they are admitted as a state, Puerto Rican citizens would lose much of their individuality. It is very likely that if Puerto Rico becomes an American state the citizens will be required to learn English as their primary language. By creating this requirement, Puerto Ricans would lose a lot of their native culture which is infused into their native tongue. Also, considering that currently "Fewer than 20 percent of Puerto Ricans can speak English fluently," (queenscourier.com) it would be a large culture shock to have to convert completely to the English language. Besides diminishing individuality through language, Puerto Rico would also lose its individual place in the Miss Universe Pageant as well as the Olympic games (essortment.com & queenscourier.com). This is only another thing that would be taken away from the unique culture of Puerto Rico if it were to become a state. Overall, I believe that the culture of Puerto Rico should be preserved. Although it may be in the best interest of the United States to bring Puerto Rico in as a state (considering the extra money it would bring the government) I feel that the happiness and individuality of the Puerto Rican citizens is what matters most. For this reason, I do not feel that admitting Puerto Rico as the 51st state in America would be the better option.
I think that Puerto Rican should have the right to vote one whether or not they want to become a part of the United States. In the Fox News article it talks about Puerto Rico being protected by America as well as other benefits that our country offers. They also are allowed to come into our county whenever they want. I feel as thought they are already almost a part of our country if they are getting the same benefits as we are. Since that, i think that they should be able to decided whether or not they want to be part of our country.
Although Puerto Rico is a U.S territory at the moment, it still reaps many benefits that the United States possesses. So why have we spent so much time debating whether it should be a state or not? Making Puerto Rico a state will not only benefit the residents living there, but it wil also benefit residents of the United States. Right now, Puerto Rico has all the benefits of being a state in America, but without any responsibilities that come along with being a state. For example, Puerto Rico does not have to pay taxes to the United States Government. If they were to become a state they would gain the responsibility of paying taxes, but also gain representation in congress,to not only have a voice but to count as a vote. They would have a vote in congress because taxation without representation is illegal. Paying taxes may seem like a negative, but it really is a positive, "becoming a state would give Puerto Rico the opportunity of improving its economic situation" (http://www.essortment.com/puerto-rican-statehood-56408.html). It would also give America a boost in there economy and help pay off the insanely high debt we owe. If Puerto Rico remains in the same place it is today, they will continue to be living with free benefits and no responsibilities, thus why Puerto Rico should become a state.
I believe that it is Puerto Rico's right as to whether or not they want to become fully immersed into the United States, but from my standpoint, as a citizen within the US, I feel like it would be to Puerto Rico's benefit to become the 51st state. They already are considered US citizens, and they have certain privileges that we do. As stated in the essortment.com article, if Puerto Rico became the 51st state, it would gain economically, tax wise and through it's ability to trade with the US's allied nations. Also, with becoming a state, the citizens will have the power to vote for various elections, including the presidency. They already are under US laws, so why not have say in how they should be ran.
I agree with most of you that Puerto Rico should not become a state, mostly because of the fact that Puerto Rico's economy would be hurt drastically and that it would be better off for them to remain as a territory, were they would still have the benefits of a US citizen.
As an american it is hard for me to put myself into a Puerto Rican's shoes. Being a commonwealth is very comfortable for many Puerto Rican's, they get the assistance of the United States, however are still not considered american. The United States may be ready for that 51st state, however it should be up to the Puerto Ricans to decide if they are ready. I feel they should join the United States, the change would be very small and they would get all the extra benefits that comes with it. Puerto Rico needs the United States to survive, due to a low income it would not be wise for them to claim their independence. Loosing the United States citizenship would be like throwing away a gift given to you. Most Puerto Ricans want to remain a commonwealth showing that they are fine the way they are, and in that case should not become a part of the United states.
I don’t think Puerto Rico should become a state. I agree with Grace when she says they have a good life now, and becoming a state will be too big of a change. They have a good life now, so why change? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hs37IXB9ow This is a video of a news broadcast giving an overview of whether or not Puerto Rico should become a state. It says how Puerto Rico does not have the same rights as US citizens like they can’t vote for the president and have no senators, but they also do not have to pay federal taxes. The big question is probably what the citizens would rather have. They also say one of the huge changes will probably be changing their official language to English, which only about ¼ of the people speak. Luis Gutierrez Illinois representative who grew up in Puerto Rico agrees and says becoming a state will destroy its culture and uniqueness as well. I also do not agree with the HR 2499 vote to decide Puerto Rico’s status. Like the Fox article says, it’s like a trick to get Puerto Rico into statehood. The first vote is something everyone will agree with, but they just don’t all agree with the terms of getting there. Next, statehood will be up against other options that have no chance of beating it. Right not, things should stay the way they are, unless after 3 failed votes, the majority wants to become a state.
I believe that Puerto Rico should become the 51st state. There are plenty of pros that Puerto Rico could benefit from by becoming a state. The most compelling argument for statehood that Puerto Ricans have, stated in the article posted by Essortment.com, is the representation in congress as well as electoral votes in presidential elections. This is something that Puerto Ricans have wanted for a very long time. Puerto Rico could also benefit economically if statehood were to be achieved. As of right now, Puerto Rico benefits from U.S. protection without having to pay taxes. This is why i believe Puerto Rico should become a state. So that in this economy we could benefit from the extra tax money.
Clearly the Puerto Ricans have not yet decided whether or not they would like to become a state yet, for as of the last plebiscite in 1998, the Puerto Ricans still have very mixed feelings about the fate of the territory. In 1998, out of the options given, over half voted for "none of the above."
In response to the question, I have considered what would be the best for Puerto Rico's citizens. In doing this, it is my belief that they should not become the fifty-first state. I like what Danielle Chaloux had to say in reference to the Essortment article: "They receive the protection of the United States during wartime, benefits from Medicare, and the benefits of U.S. citizenship without paying taxes" (Chaloux). In the words of Glenn Beck: "That's a pretty sweet deal."
The Essortment article also discusses the cons of becoming a state. Gabrielle Amlicke discusses a view that I share in regards to the money aspect of this issue. It would become far more expensive to live in Puerto Rico if they joined the states. The Essortment article shows how if Puerto Rico became a state, their monthly home payments would rise 62%; this is just one example of how prices would go out of control. I feel like Puerto Rico becoming a state would actually cause economic problems, not help them (even despite the increased income and trade that was discussed by the Essortment article). Because of these possible economic problems, I do not see a need for them to become a state.
I believe that Commonwealth of Puerto Rico should become a state for the good of its people. Puerto Rico's Resident Commissioner Pedro R. Pierluisi believes becoming a state will be advantageous economically and politically. Statehood grants Puerto Ricans a true voice in the government, funding for health and wellness programs, and equal and just treatment, says Pierluisi. He concludes his statement with "The time is now for us to rise as a people, demand our rights, contribute our talents and claim our deserved place in the flag of stars and stripes. The time of being content with only some of the benefits of American citizenship is over. With Statehood, a future of dignity, equality and progress awaits us." With Pierluisi being such a strong believer in Puerto Rico becoming a state, it is hard not to agree with him.
Sally Martinelli, Class 5
Source: Pierluisi, Pedro R. "PUERTO RICO RESIDENT COMMISSIONER INVOKES DIGNITY, EQUALITY IN CLARION CALL FOR PUERTO RICO STATEHOOD." U.S. Council for Puerto Rico Statehood. 28 May 2010. Web. 02 Oct. 2011.
I think that Puerto Rico should not be a state. First of all it has been one of our territories since after the Spanish American war in 1898. The citizens have voted to not be part of the states. It would be nice to have them chip in and pay taxes but they obviously don't want to be a state. In the Puerto Rican Statehood Ahead? article it mentions that in the HR 2499 will be almost pushing the citizens into voting for statehood because they do not want the other choices. If we force them to become a state I feel it will only lead to regret and a rebuttal from them. I agree with Eric abut how "they get the best of both worlds" for being a territory, we shouldnt change anything that isnt broken.
After reading the articles provided, I found many good points on why Puerto Rico should become a state. One point, however, stood out among the others, and it stated that if Puerto Rico were to be granted statehood, it would give the US more of a reason to give Puerto Rico the attention it needs. By granting it statehood, it would have the same rights as any US citizen and it would have a better chance of economic prosperity.
I do think that Puerto Rico should become the 51st state. This is because for so long, it has basically been part of the U.S. with paying taxes, using the same currency, and nearly making english its first language. Also, to go to Puerto Rico, a passport isn't necessary, making it as easy as traveling to another state. If all of these aspects are so similar to ones of the 50 states in the U.S., we may as well put it on paper that Puerto Rico is one of our states. They should absolutely have the right to decide this, however, I don't think the U.S. should be apposed whatsoever. As mentioned in the Fox News article, Tennessee did a very similar movement to become the 16th state. If it worked before, it can certainly work again.
In my opinion, Puerto Rico should remain as they are now. There is no need for them to become a state at this time. They are self governing and are doing fine with that. Also, Puerto Ricans use US currency, have US citizenship, can travel in and out of america, are included in organizations such as Miss America, and have medicare. They are already practically a state with all of their assets. And by becoming a state, they would just have to pay tax; and who wants to pay tax? So Puerto Rico has no need to become a state.
As most other students said, Puerto Rico should have the choice whether or not they want to be apart of the United States, and become a 51st state. Though, at the same time, it's unfair that they don't have to pay taxed on Medicare, protection, etc. On another note, Puerto Rico seems to be fine where they are, and deserve the right to stay put as they are, or become a state. If they choose to become a state, they will have to pay taxes, and follow the rules that the other states do. But if they stay their own country, they get to decide how things are run, and keep a unique culture. If Puerto Rico decides to become a state, I think it's a poor choice.
I think that Puerto Rico should remain a U.S territory. One article says that this has "worked for almost 50 years already. We get the best of both worlds." Puerto Rico will get protected by the United States in time of war, and Puerto Ricans enjoy many privellages of being U.S citizens. At the same time they are able to be viewed as an individual nation in the olympic games, and maintain their rich culture. I agree with Danielle Chaloux that the projected rise in cost o living is a negative reason for Puerto Rico to become a state, because the article said that the average monthly income for them is $300, which is $3,600/month. the poverty line in the US is about $22,000. With rising prices associated with statehood, Puerto Rico is in a world of trouble if they become a state, so staying how they are is the best option.
In my opinion it would be a bad choice for Puerto Rico to become a state. Right now they are at a good balance, they are territory of the United States but are not completely controlled by our congress. They have their own constitution that they live by and establish votes for themselves. They have tried voting on weather they should become a state or not. but in reality the United States doesn't even acknowledge that vote as valid as shown in this quote. "This vote does not grant Puerto Rico statehood, it simply gives Puerto Ricans the right to determine if statehood is something they want for themselves". http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,591683,00.html#ixzz1ZfNiI6fW. So the united states is not telling the Puerto Ricans' everything and they aren't even a state yet. That is a pretty good indicator that that Puerto Rico will gain nothing from becoming a state.
I think Puerto-Rico is better off not becoming a state. As the essortment.com article points out, the average income of Puerto-Ricans is about $300. If Puerto-Rico becomes the 51st state, the price of living will greatly increase. Unless income skyrockets with the expenses, which is basically guaranteed not to in our current economy, Puerto-Rico is likely to rapidly obtain the highest homeless population in the United States. The remaining options if they do not choose to become a state is remaining a commonwealth or becoming independent. I think they should remain a commonwealth to keep protection from the United Stated, and it doesn't hurt that they don't have to pay taxes. In the event that they do move for independence, they'll gain the ability to trade with whatever nations they choose, but they'll loose US protection which probably is not the best choice for a small country.
I believe that there are quite a number of reasons as to why Puerto Rico should not become a state at this time. First of all, in the vote of the citizens of Puerto Rico it was more or less a 50-50 tie between those against and for statehood, and 50% is far from the majority need to take the movement more seriously. Second of all, I am unsure that the average Puerto Rican citizen has the income to manage with the US taxes that come with statehood. Lastly, Puerto Rico is considerably detached from the US and unlike Hawaii, English is far from the most prevalent language or culture. Thus I think Puerto Rico's viewpoints would likely be entirely unaligned with those of mainland America. Should Puerto Rico in the future prove to be more decisive in its desires, more active in US political affairs and demonstrate the required wealth, I think there would be no reason why we should reject an eager and ready state.
I think that Puerto Rico should become a state. Although it has the capability and necesities to become independent, I feel that Congress will continue to drag their feet like mentioned in the fox news article and eventually not allow it. They are owned and controlled by the U.S. and therefore should not be able to have a say. By being a territory of the United States and by being controlled by Congress there is just no room for independence. It is clear that Congress is looking to move foward with this situation to arrive at a reasonable conclusion, statehood or independence. I found that it is also clear that the people of Puerto Rico are in no position to move towards anything because of some benefits seen in the quote "They get to enjoy many of the benefits of America — like protection — and they don't have to pay any taxes" (fox news article). But as the powerhouse and the one in charge, Congress has to stop "dragging their feet" and make progression towards the decision. Puerto Ricans have been well off with their benefits and its time that they pay taxes for protection and other benefits like the rest of us. Either way, no decision will hurt the U.S. so Congress mine as well work harder to ending the issue.
Jake Feinstein Class 5.
I think that Puerto rico should become a state because the United States already has a lot of control with them, and their relationship is strong. The transition of having Puerto Rico be it's completely independent nation is probably not the smartest idea, as Us congress already has a decent amount of power on Puerto rico. In the article Puerto Rican Statehood, is says "Puerto Rico's relationship with the United States has been directly responsible for Puerto Rico having one of the highest standard of living of Central, South America, and the Caribbean". The strong relationship only makes it smart to have Puerto Rico be the 51st State as this would strengthen the economy, and our political system.
Puerto Rico should not become the 51st state in the U.S. Puerto Rico does not produce anything of real value to the United States economy or its citizens. Puerto Rico would be a major welfare state and they drain on the U.S. government and its tax payers. For us to even consider Puerto Rico as a 51st state is wrong. They would have to give something to us instead of us always giving them protection. It was stated in the Fox News article that when Tennessee which was one of the U.S. territories wanted to become a state, they had to force the issue themselves and then demand to be seated in America. Puerto Rico hasn't done any of that. It should be left the way it is. "they get to enjoy many of the benefits of America — like protection — and they don't have to pay any taxes." ( Fox News) If they aren't doing anything for us then they should not be a state.
No, I don't think that Puerto Rico should become a state. Right now, as both Fox News article mentioned, they are being provided with benefits from the US like protection and traveling within the US without a passport -all without having to pay taxes. Although they don't have a vote in congress, they do have a voice, so they aren't under complete control. Also, as the Essortment article says, they have the highest standard of living out of Central, South America and the Caribbean. If they become a state, this would increase even further, but so would the cost of living. I agree with what many students wrote, that Puerto Rico should at least have the right to choose whether or not they want to be a state. I think that they will most likely opt not to be a state, as they have been faced with the decision several times before and clearly wish to remain a commonwealth.
I firmly believe that Puerto Rico should indeed be included as the 51st State because the effects would benefit the economy, and increase the quality of life for the poor sections of the territory. The political benefits would also including giving Puerto Rico a voice in the Senate with 2 Senators and at least 7 chairs in Congress. Puerto Ricans would also be included in the high American incomes, thus improving infrastructure and mobility as a state. In my opinion, the most important reason would be that Puerto Rico would be included in the electoral vote for American Presidency.
I believe that Puerto Rico should not become the 51st U.S. state. The cost of living would rise dramatically for Puerto Ricans, and neither the citizens of Puerto Rico or the U.S. government would have an ample amount of money to support this. I read which has pros and cons of statehood. It notes that the housing rates and utilities would rise, which will leave people struggling. It also notes how the national identity of Puerto Rico will be meshed with the U.S. if they become a state. This means they'll lose their seperate cultural pride, their own Olympic team, and a Miss America contestant. I also don't think Puerto Ricans can identify with American struggles and the freedoms we've fought for, so they don't really deserve to be called a state of America. I agree with Stephanie R. when she said, "They get the protection of the United States without having to pay any taxes." They are included in U.S. affairs, but they don't have any financial burdens associated with it, and they have enough debt struggles with their own island to handle. Another article I read was It mostly argues about how the biggest problem with statehood would be the language. The prominent language in Puerto Rico is Spanish, and no where in the bill to become a state does it say that Puerto Ricans will be required to learn English. This will cause so many problems if they can't understand what's going on in the country, and they won't be able to communicate with the rest of the U.S. effectively. I don't think we should have to make special arrangements for them to better understand us. If they want to unify with our country, they should learn our language. Puerto Rican statehood would cause more problems than it's worth, so it should stay where it is.
Personally, I think Puerto Rico should not become a state. Not only do some Puerto Rican's not want to become part of the USA, but if they were to be part of the USA their culture would change, since they would have to adapt to America's culture. They will essentially loose their independence, and just join into the issues America has going on right now. In an article on Foxnews.com it say's that "The Caribbean island has been a U.S. territory since 1898. The island was given limited autonomy in 1952. Puerto Ricans generally pay no federal income taxes." I think that they should stay where they are right now, and not try to change anything, because if they break it off, because right now they are getting some rights from the USA and rights from their own country, so I believe it's best for them to stay put.
I think that Puerto Rico should not become a state. I agree with many people like Andy Ryan and Gracie Whitaker, they are doing great as they are right now. Like the Fox News article said, Puerto Rico does not have to pay many of the taxes we have to. If they were to become a state, the federal government would be taking their peoples taxes away and giving it to their local government that wouldn’t be much help to the people. In this, I disagree with Jake Feinstein and some other of my classmates, to get Puerto Rico as a state, we’ll be imposing more taxes on their people who need the money. We can’t help their poor without making more poor people in some other place as shown by the work by the federal government. They are able to rely on themselves right now and if they feel the need to change the fact that their not a state, they have every right to do so. It’s only a matter of whether the people feel that they want or need to be a state. And right now, they don’t.
I know that in the Fox News article it said that the people of Puerto Rico have voted against becoming the 51st state in the United States times, but they have perks that they shouldn’t have if they aren’t a state. Puerto Rico is protected by the United States, yet they don’t have to pay taxes. They are getting a free ride off of us American’s. I do not think that is right, I don’t mind the fact that they aren’t a state, which is up to the people of Puerto Rico, but we should not be paying for the protection of their land. I think that for now we should just let Puerto Rico decide if they want to become a state or not, and while they do that we should leave Puerto Rico to their own devices.
Nick Busino Class 4
Puerto Rico should have to become a state because as of now, as Mrs. Hurley said today in class, Puerto Rico doesn't pay any federal taxes even though they have the benefit of American tourism and protection. And as Glenn Beck says in the Fox News Article "that's a pretty sweet deal." It is considered a "territory" and the only reason they don't vote to become a state is because they don't have to pay any taxes. So it is not a question of rights and freedom it is a question of whether or not you pay your taxes. It just seems like we are providing so many benefits to this area for no cost, statehood is the fair thing to do. And it is the most beneficial to the economy. To be a part of this country you must be a state because that is how are system works. Sure the cost for living their will increase but that is what must be done for the benefits we give them. It is only fair.
As an American who is of Puerto Rican descent, it is natural for myself to agree with the fact that Puerto Rico should merge with the U.S. to become the 51st state. However, I have very mixed feelings on this issue. While it would be good for Puerto Rico to gain full benefits of being apart of the U.S. and according to the assortment article, gain ecconomically, I also think Puerto Rico is not ready yet to run on its own, and still believe that the United States should oversee operations. However, after reading various source articles, I have came to the conclusion that Puerto Rico should be able to become to 51st state, because there are very strong arguements supporting this side, including a improvement in its economy, the ability to trade with U.S. allies, etc. In a comment above, Ian Solaski had stated that they have been functioning under U.S. laws, so why can't they have a say on who enforces these laws [the president]. I agree with this statement and the fact that Puerto Rico should be able to fend for themselves, and be granted what they have advocated for for years.
I believe that Puerto Rico should become the 51st state because if annexed, they would pay income taxes and therefore wouldn't receive needless free benefits. I also believe that Puerto Rico statehood is a valid concept because it is continually presented and, as stated in the article at http://www.prstatehood.com/home/index.asp multiple times, it is widely supported, with the only real argument against it being "Its not the right time", although in the current world crisis it can be assumed that we should take all the help we can get, and if Puerto Rico is willing to carry our burden, they should be welcome to.
I do not think Puerto Rico should be a state, 50 is fine, and Peurto Rico is doing good on their own. They get US citizenship without taxes and also no vote. 51 is a bad number anyways. They seem to have some kind of a choice and if they really wanted to they probably could become a state but their is no reason to do this. Life is good for the Puerto Ricans and the Americans.
I think that Puerto Rico should be validated as a state of the United States. Puerto Rico has gone through decades struggling with laws and politicians passing unsatisfying plebiscites. Therefore, Puerto Rico has definitely earned its position in the United States. Adding Puerto Rico to our union would benefit Puerto Rico very much politically and economically. Puerto Ricans are almost despondent in a sense that they have been oppressed by America for so long. Furthermore, they need their freedom culturally and as a union. This was reiterated on escorttment.com as saying, Becoming a state would also benefit Puerto Rico politically as well, by “removing Puerto Rico from under the territorial claws of their U.S constitution and would put Puerto Rico on the same political footing as the other 50 states”. Although he United States is going through a recession, we still have hope for jobs here and remain superior economically. In contrast to Puerto Rico, who struggles with job employment and poverty. America emerging as a world power taught us to aid other countries in need. Puerto Rico could definitely use our support in its strive for independence and power.
I believe that Puerto Rico should not become a US state because as a self-governing commonwealth, they should have the right to decide for themselves. Based on the advantages they get from the United States, there is no reason for them to become the 51st state. In a Fox News article called Puerto Rican Statehood Ahead?, Glenn Beck writes, “They get to enjoy many of the benefits of America — like protection — and they don't have to pay any taxes.” While they still have these benefits, they also need to maintain their own government which they have abided by since 1898, when America won the territory in the Spanish-American War. Puerto Rico has its own rights, and has the right to continue being no more than a US territory, just as it has always been.
I believe that Puerto Rico should not become a US state because as a self-governing commonwealth, they should have the right to decide for themselves. Based on the advantages they get from the United States, there is no reason for them to become the 51st state. In a Fox News article called Puerto Rican Statehood Ahead?, Glenn Beck writes, “They get to enjoy many of the benefits of America — like protection — and they don't have to pay any taxes.” While they still have these benefits, they also need to maintain their own government which they have abided by since 1898, when America won the territory in the Spanish-American War. Puerto Rico has its own rights, and has the right to continue being no more than a US territory, just as it has always been.
I think that Puerto Rico should've became a state a long time ago. It seems rather senseless to exclude what is still considered American territory from being considered part of the country, especially since they are under our governmental jurisdiction, meaning that the USA handles all of Puerto Rican Foreign affairs and decides what form of government it is ruled by. Puerto Rican civilians are considered american citizens, with all the rights that entails...yet they have no political representatives within our government and they make no claims that they would actually want to break off into their own independence. It also seems to be a little lenient to be sinking money into funding medicare and protection as sort of a "freebie" to a country that doesn't offer much in return. I understand that taxing Puerto Rico is potentially hazardous, in the event that this particular course of actions will cause widespread poverty within this small nation, however it is still risky to provide the entire population of Puerto Rico with medicare and yet a large number of Americans is severely lacking in this service and on top of it they still pay taxes while Puerto Ricans reap our benefits with little in return. It would also appear that Puerto Rico doesn't exactly want to be entirely reliant on itself as well. Puerto Rico would not be able to sustain itself on its own, and would leave it susceptible to becoming controlled by another more powerful country. Now, going back to the exclusion of the Puerto Rican government from our legislature...in a recent UN meeting regarding the decolonization of Puerto Rico, the Puerto Rican government wasn't invited or informed of the meeting until afterwards. This leaves Puerto Rico in an unstable situation because they won't have any say in whether the USA withdraws its influence and support which will leave Puerto Rico severly worse off than it is now. The best course of action would be to indoctrinate Puerto Rico into the USA because then they would have the military protection and at least some medicare provision so even if Puerto Rico suffered some setbacks from attaining statehood, they would have the security of being more involved with internal affairs.
http://www.prstatehood.com/documents/UNITED_NATIONS_RECOGNIZES_PUERTO_RICO_RIGHT_TO_SELF_DETERMINATION.pdf
Post a Comment